Welcome, Visitor Number

Translate

Showing posts with label tempo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tempo. Show all posts

13 October 2017

Post 557: HOW TO PLAY AND HOW NOT TO PLAY JAZZ - CHALK AND CHEESE

I watched and listened to two well-filmed YouTube performances by traditional jazz bands. While doing so, I jotted down my thoughts. They were:

Band A
Opaque sound, bottom-heavy; bland interpretation; succession of tedious 32-bar solo choruses; lethargic; tempo dragging; textures blurred; musicians looking bored; two players chatting to each other during another's solo chorus; not much sense of teamwork; lack of variety in the dynamics; clichés; signs of strain in the playing.

Band B
Plenty of drive; bustling energy, even in supporting teamwork; clear textures; well-judged tempo; meticulous attention to detail; delicacy of shading; superb ensembles and attack; varied dynamics.

There is such a wide range in the quality of traditional jazz to be seen on YouTube!

Which two bands were these? It would be invidious to name them. But I can tell you the first was a well-known elderly English band filmed at an English jazz club. The other was a band directed by a young lady on cornet, filmed in a New Orleans street.

13 August 2015

Post 247: GUEST WRITER CHRIS REILLEY ON SETTING THE KEY, THE TEMPO, AND THE VOLUME

Pianist Chris Reilley has submitted articles for use in this Blog before - most recently on the subject of Boogie-Woogie.

Chris has now emailed the article below to me. I hope you will find it of interest.

-----------------------------------------------------

Part two of the various Devices: Breaks, Stops, Riffs, Rhythms and More article which I submitted in February this year, I would like to cover three other aspects which could be considered whilst playing Traditional Jazz namely Key choice and changes Tempo and Volume.

Choosing the Key and Key Changes

Recently I was enthralled by a recording made by the Shotgun Jazz band called “You Always Hurt The One You Love” with the vocal being taken by Marla Dixon (trumpet and leader). In this recording the ensemble is played to begin with and just before the band goes into the Vocal they change key – normally this would be to suit the singer's choice of key for singing. However the band revert back to the original key for the following ensemble and then lo-and-behold Marla sings again in the ensemble key.

For me this is the first time that I have heard any vocalist attempt to do this, as usually the reason for the change of key is because the melody line is outside the vocalist's range.


More often than not a proposed change from the original composed key (say from one of the sharp keys) is to make the tune easier to play for Bb Instruments. For example Concert G Major (1#), D Major (2#'s), A Major (3#'s) etc. would normally be transposed to the nearest (or easiest) flattened keys:- Concert F major (1b) or Ab Major (4b's), C Major (natural) or Eb Major (3b's), Bb Major (2b's) or Ab Major (4b's). Note these are all shown in Concert Keys whereas the Bb Instruments reading their parts would refer the key of Bb major to their key as C Major.
(Note I found this so confusing when I started to learn to play both Clarinet and Trombone that I thereafter memorised the note names on my instrument as the Concert key names.)

All of these choices have to be moderated by the musical range of both the instrument and musician. Some tunes require a very large range with some instruments naturally limited to something like one and a half octaves (not counting the musician's limitations) and in some cases the top end of the available notes might be slightly out of tune (this is especially a problem with Keyed Instruments where the musician has to “bend” the note to keep in tune).

There is no doubt that being able to play in numerous keys is very desirable but it is far easier playing those tunes that are more natural to the instrument and it makes improvising (a salient part of playing Jazz) far easier as well.
Unfortunately the obvious choice for many Jazz Bands is to play a lot of tunes in the easiest keys of concert Bb, Eb and F Major. Whilst this might be the easiest of choices it tends to make for a “Repetitive” range of sound and for those who want to “stand out from the crowd” it might be wise to include tunes in other more uncommon keys.

The use of a change of key whilst playing a chorus (or the main theme) can add interest to the tune for the listener. One example of this can be heard when some Bands play a tune like Tiger Rag where the last chorus is played say a whole tone up from the previous chorus. Eg. the penultimate chorus is in Ab and the last chorus is in Bb. There are numerous examples of this which can be accessed on YouTube.

Another way for Bands to stretch their ability is to play tunes that include several parts, such as those that have a verse (usually in a different key from the chorus), or the more complicated Rags, Stomps or Marches. Not only do these change key from part to part, but the original arrangement (if followed) has other features including “Breaks”, “Riffs”, “Stops” Tempo Change, Latin Rhythms, Minor Strains, etc.

A good guide is to listen to recordings of the Masters playing the tunes you enjoy, but take into account that the equipment used in the early days was not as accurate in respect of timing compared with more modern day so that some recordings could be as much as a tone different to the live performance, so for example if a recording appears to be in D Major, it was probably recorded in Db, if it appears to be recorded in Db it was probably recorded in C Major and most commonly if it appears to be recorded in B major, it was probably recorded in Bb.
Fortunately we are now blessed with Computer Software that can easily correct this deficiency.
Choosing the Tempo

As this can be a more contentious subject, I would like to re-iterate that these words represent my view only and hopefully others will agree.

The first point I would like to make is that the tempo a tune is played at out reflects how the Band intend it to be heard i.e. “Fast”, “Medium” or “Slow” and all the varieties in between. This is usually decided by the leader of the Band and either counted or “tapped in”. Another criterion I would consider important is that of “Swing”. (One way I have found helpful to listen for the “Swing Element” is to listen to the tune being played - or play it solo yourself - and see if you can feel the rhythm throughout.)
I use an example which I have used before of Wynton Marsalis playing “Buddy Bolden's Blues”:-
It is not necessary to watch the Video because you can feel the “swing” from just the audio.
I think most Dancers would prefer that any tune would be easier to dance to if it “swings” as this is the natural rhythm of the tune. As Jazz was more often a “dance music”, I think we ought to be guided by that.
The most common problem I have come across is that of playing a tune too quickly (racing) or at the other end of the scale, playing it too slowly (dragging). With the faster tunes there are several considerations to be made:-
  1. If there are established complicated many-note solos or ensembles required (for example High Society where the Clarinet plays the famous Alphonse Picou solo) the tempo needs to take this into account.
    As a guide watch the Video on YouTube in which he plays this solo at some extraordinary age of about 90 years. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ftr_knt4D8
  2. If there is a Vocal in the tune, the speed has to take account of the singer being able to sing all the words throughout the song without difficulty. As examples, here are two approaches to two different tunes, each played at different tempos:-
    Two versions of “There'll be Hot Time in the Old Town Tonight:-
    Two versions of “Down in Honky Tonk Town”
    Using the “dancing to” yardstick I cannot see anyone preferring the faster of the two tunes. This is however my own personal opinion.
  1. Some of the slower tunes conversely should not be played so slow that they “drag” and yet nor played too quickly and lose the finesse of the melody.
  2. A very great bone of contention for me is when a Band loses control of a steady tempo of any tune, excitement creeps in and away it goes. I confess to being guilty of this myself, but I have learnt to try and control it and as part of the Rhythm Section it is part of our job to try and steady any “racing” down. It is most helpful for the “front line” if the rhythm is kept steady as they want to be able to play their improvisation neatly around the rhythmic accompaniment.
Choosing the Volume

In days gone by there was no such thing as Amplification or Electronic Instruments on a Concert Stand, Dance Hall, Concert Hall, Marching Band instrumentalists were positioned (in most cases) according to how loud they were. In the Recording Studio a similar approach was taken with the weakest-sounding instruments being closest to the “Recording Horn”. From photographs of Jazz Bands performing on Stage it can be seen that a common line up position was arrived at with the line up usually being (facing the Band: “front line” left – Trombone, Centre – Trumpet/Cornet, Right – Reeds (Clarinet/Alto Sax/Tenor Sax). “back line” left – Drums, to his right (with a four piece back line) String Bass/Brass Bass, next right - Piano next right and sometimes part of the “front line” - Banjo/Guitar. The leader would usually be the Horn Player and he/she would usually call the tune to play and set the Tempo. The overall sound would be adjusted most likely by the Drummer who would bring the volume down for the quietest instruments – Clarinet, Bass, Piano and Banjo solos and/or vocals.
At some point the playing volume might change to allow for the larger auditorium and towards the end of a tune. I suspect much of this detail was sorted out at a practice when all arrangements were thrashed out as well.
Then came along electronic amplification and everybody was “miced up” and thereafter the Band Sound was in the hands of the “mixer boys” or in the more hospitable venues, the band used their own portable gear (sometimes less than great) and had to check the sound mid-session.
In my experience the audience soon let you know if you are playing too loudly.

I hope this information does not discourage anyone who may be reading this and who is interested in starting or joining a Jazz Band. I can assure you that playing jazz with other people in a band can be very enjoyable, particularly when it goes well.


Post 246: WHAT IS GOOD TRADITIONAL JAZZ?



I received this e-mail:

Hi Ivan,

You have strong opinions about what is good traditional jazz and what is bad. I know nothing about music. I can't read music. I never learnt to play an instrument. Can you please explain to me what makes some jazz performances better than others?


Wow! That's a tough question.

So let me say right from the start that appreciating any kind of art is a very personal matter. What pleases me may not please you. And that is just how it should be. So I will answer the question in my own way but shall not be surprised if you hold a completely different opinion.

Knowing about music


First, I don't think it's essential to know a lot about music in order to be stirred by traditional jazz or to feel the excitement that it generates. But it does add a little to the intellectual side of appreciation. For example, if you are listening to a piece made up of several different sections (e.g. Buddy's Habit or Climax Rag), it is satisfying to understand which point in the music the band has reached and to be aware when it modulates into a different key. It also makes it a little more interesting if you know something about the chord progression, no matter what tune the band is playing. In other words, you may appreciate it just a little more if you know about the 'grammar' of the music.

But with or without such knowledge, I think it's possible to distinguish between really well played traditional jazz and the not so good.

Preparing and Rehearsing

I think some bands over-rehearse. Things become too arranged and formalized. Much of the freedom and looseness that are features of the best traditional jazz are lost if the players have to concentrate too hard on their 'part' in the 'arrangement'. There is stiffness in the playing of some bands using this approach, especially if they become over-reliant on printed music on stands in front of them.

At the opposite extreme, it is common enough for good traditional jazz to be played without any rehearsal or preparation. Bring together the right mix of experienced players and a fine concert can occur.

But in general I think the best traditional jazz is produced by bands who rehearse at least occasionally, mainly to discuss their music and clarify their approaches to their repertoire. They should tidy up the trickier moments, ensure they are all using the same tune structure and chord progression and they should agree on any special tune endings. The little bit of extra work put in like that can be appreciated and pays off in a better public performance.

Amplification

In general, I think traditional jazz is likely to sound better if played without amplification. (So much 'music' in the last fifty years has been made hard to bear - for me, anyway - by the use of electronic devices and massive amplification.) It is so pleasant to hear musicians in a room with good acoustics and no amplification. You appreciate the sounds of all the instruments in their natural glory. There is no electrical 'humming' or blurring of tone. Performances in Preservation Hall (or in London's Wigmore Hall) testify to the truth of this.

But I accept that bands - in special circumstances - sometimes need amplification. In these cases, it is best if it can be kept to a minimum, for example one microphone for use by the vocalist.

Melody and Soul

Most tunes in our repertoire have stood the test of a very long time. So a good band performance must respect a good melody. There is soul in these old tunes and a good performance finds and expresses that soul. We should hear the melody clearly - maybe decorated and caressed; but it should always be there at the heart of the music. As the late great Chris Blount (clarinet) once said to me, 'If there's no soul, it's just a load of notes.'

Tempo

A good traditional jazz band sets a tempo which is appropriate to the tune and its chosen interpretation; and keeps to that tempo - other than for special effects. It's bad traditional jazz when a tune drags. (I have noticed this quite a lot in YouTube videos.) It can happen either because the tune is started too slowly or because the band slows down during the performance or because of labouring from the rhythm section - especially the drummer. (I don't know why, but On The Sunny Side of the Street is an example of a tune that is particularly prone to labouring!)

Collective Improvisation

When - in ensemble choruses - one instrument (usually the trumpet) is stating the melody, there should be creative support from the other 'front line' instruments (normally the clarinet and trombone). Teamwork is the key to great traditional jazz. If teamwork is good, the performance is more likely to impress. The support will use syncopation and counterpoint. It will be decorative and yet also - by finding the best phrases and harmonies - will push the tune along. You will feel that all three front-line players are listening and responding to each other's ideas and statements. Among today's top players, Barnabus Jones, Haruka Kickuchi and Charlie Halloran (trombones) and Chloe Feoranzo, James Evans, Jonathan Doyle, Aurora Nealand and Ewan Bleach (reeds) are examples of musicians to study on YouTube if you want to see this done supremely well.

Jazzy Devices

This is really an aspect of improvising. But it is important enough to deserve separate mention. A good performance (certainly an exciting one) usually requires a generous dose of those devices that make jazz - especially traditional jazz - so distinctive. Notes bluesily bent or flattened (in the right places), glissandi, breaks, syncopation, the use of 6ths and 9ths where they take us by surprise - all these elements enrich the performance. Without this 'jazziness' you may be left with some very pretty music for dancing but it will lack the spirit of early New Orleans jazz.

Rhythm Section

First, as my friend Barrie said to me, the expression 'rhythm section' is relatively modern and misleading. The whole band should think of itself as the rhythm section. But these days when leaders refer to their rhythm section, they mean the part of the band likely to consist of two or three or four players selected from percussion, banjo, guitar, piano, bass [string or brass]. In a good performance, these players will, as the saying goes, 'sound like one man'. They too must listen carefully to each other and to the trumpet, clarinet and trombone. In so many of the elderly British bands I have heard, or watched on YouTube, they certainly do not sound like one man: often the drummer is too loud and his rhythmic patterns are disruptive to what his colleagues seem to be trying to achieve. At least for the brighter and quicker tunes, most of the time the rhythm section in unison should play a pulsating but not too loud four-to-the-bar poom-poom-poom-poom (not um-CHUCK-um-CHUCK). This pumps the front line along and sets the audience's feet tapping. A good drummer drives the band without being loud or exhibitionist and a good pianist subjects his skills (in ensembles) to the need for a steady rhythmic and chordal underpinning of the music.

Solo Choruses

In performance, most bands include a sequence of 'solo' choruses (normally 32 bars, or even 64 bars) by several of the players in every tune. Often these solos have nothing much of interest to say (they are what Chris Blount would have called 'just a load of notes'), though, if the band has a very good pianist, they give him a rare opportunity to show what he can do. Often solo-takers try to play something stretching to the full their technical skills - showing how clever they are. I suppose this is fair enough if they are technically brilliant. Festival audiences can be counted on to applaud this sort of thing. But my view is that flashy and often raucous solo choruses are not an essential part of good traditional jazz.


Fortunately, in solo choruses a few players are technically brilliant and highly creative at the same time (James Evans again is a great example).

On the whole, though, I don't enjoy a performance padded out with numerous dull solo choruses in which the players have nothing but a string of clichés to offer. I prefer the more creative, unpredictable kind of playing (as best exemplified in the performances of Tuba Skinny) where one player takes the lead for a short time (perhaps 16 bars) but usually other players provide decorative accompaniment to this kind of 'soloing' (another example of good teamwork). Such playing gives the audiences constant delightful surprises.

Sometimes a rather special chorus contributes to a pleasing performance. For example, a band may try a 'front-line-only' chorus and even better a full-band quiet chorus (just tickling the notes) before turning up the volume for the end of the tune.

Ending the Tune

I like a tune to end well, either crisply or with a neat rehearsed coda. I think messy endings are bad.

Band Demeanour

I like all members of the band to take the music seriously. I do not like it when there is much talk between players during the performance of a tune. (Guffaws at each other's private 'jokes' are even worse.) Discreet hand signals for directing the music should be enough.

Listening Test

I will end by giving this tip to my enquirer - and to anybody else like him. When you next listen to a traditional jazz recording, try focusing your ear on just the bass player. If it's a good band, you will be amazed at the precision and importance of his or her contribution.

Now try focusing on just the clarinet. Listen carefully to the notes he or she is playing. How well and how cleverly do they blend into the overall sound?

Try listening intently to the drummer or indeed any of the instruments and you may be surprised at how much your appreciation of what the individuals do (or fail to do) helps you to sort out performances that are really 'good'.

17 June 2015

Post 228: DEVICES, BREAKS, STOPS, RIFFS, RHYTHMS

Chris Reilley
I have received an article for publication written by my friend Chris Reilley, who has played piano in bands here in the English Midlands for several decades. Thank you, Chris, and I hope many readers will find this technical material very informative. Here is the article.
=======================

Devices: Breaks, Stops, Riffs, Rhythms and More


One of the most interesting aspects to me in playing Jazz (Jass) music is the playing of the above types of additions to the tune arrangements as these additions bring new excitement and anticipation both to listeners and dancers which is not heard in any other form of Dance Music.

In my case and in bands I have played with I have used the “Break” in one of my solos independently of the established “Break point” by calling “Break” to the rest of the Rhythm section at a point of my own choice and this can change from performance to performance. Sometimes other members of the front line do the same with a direct signal during their solo. This can be risky on occasion and we all have to be on our toes, but the unexpected act can create a thrilling spontaneous effect.

Now to explain each term used becomes somewhat more difficult as these “terms” are used mostly in jazz music and so far I have not found a book which deals with this in any way whatsoever. The “AB Guide To Music Theory" by Eric Taylor which I have used on past occasions makes no mention of the terms “Breaks”, “Stops” or “Riffs” and anyway I suspect that these terms are more likely covered by books on Musical Arrangement (which I do not own). So the following are my interpretation of these terms:-



Break:- A rhythmical pause in the music which allows one (or more) instruments to play an improvised passage of arranged length without accompaniment.


For example see:- Jelly Roll Morton's Red Hot Peppers – Doctor Jazz:
The breaks start in the first 8 Bars of the introduction and continue throughout the rest of the tune, including the vocal. See my Chords – below.
An interesting comparison is the same recording by Joe “King” Oliver – the composer of this tune can be heard on:-
where the arrangement is slightly different and they also play the verse.

Also a fine example of a “Split Break” where two instrumentalists share an 8-beat Break, the first taking 1 Bar followed rapidly by the other. For example see:- Bix Beiderbecke and His Gang, 1927 – At The Jazz Band Ball
For those as long in the tooth as I am, a treat from 1954 with a well-known British band: Humphrey Lyttelton's The Onions. Originally recorded by Sidney Bechet, one of the few tunes to feature an Audience Vocal Break:-

Stops:- A series of one or several beat notes played as short breaks played behind a soloist by the rest of the band in rhythm.

For example see Louis Armstrong and his Hot Five – Once in a While (not the well-known song)
This also features breaks as well. It is interesting to hear even the great Kid Ory drops a “Cod” on this not easy “Stops” passage near the end.

Another example is by Clarence Williams' Washboard Four – Candy Lips
The stops come in on the Washboard Solo again near the end.

Riffs:- A riff is more commonly associated with swing bands, but it is used with many smaller jazz bands as well. You may suggest that there is no difference between Stops and a Riff. My response would be that the Stops usually include the Rhythm section but with a Riff the rhythm is not broken. 

It is found usually when a solo is being taken by a member of the band and the remaining front line (and sometimes part of the rhythm section also) will play a rhythmic passage (i.e. in the form of an “Answer” theme) behind the soloist. Sometimes just repeating a single note of the chord. For example see Duke Ellington playing Cotton Club Stomp:

For a later recording by Sidney Bechet of All Of Me see:-

The Riffs at the beginning and end are long notes only, whereas in the Trumpet's and Bechet's solo they are repeating notes.

Rhythms:- Apart from the most common which is the Waltz, most Traditional Jazz Tunes have been composed in Common time, i.e. 4/4. There are some notable exceptions, for example the verse of Saint Louis Blues by W.C. Handy where the verse is played in a Minor key and with a Latin Rhythm. 

N.B. “Latin Rhythm” is a generic term which covers a wide range of styles, some of which are referenced below.

An example of this is:- St. Louis Blues. Blues legend Bessie Smith's only film appearance. Uncut 1929. See:-

Some Bands play the Latin Rhythm Verse first. Others go into it after playing the Chorus. The above film gives a rare insight into Bessie Smith performing in moving picture form. 

There is also a tune called Mamanita by Jelly Roll Morton. See:-

Jelly Roll Morton used many “Devices” which he describes in the Jelly Roll Morton Library of Congress recordings which are worth a listen, including Latin Rhythms. See:- 

One very sadly missed English trumpet player – Dan Pawson - took great pride in playing unusual tunes in his own inimitable style, some of which were hits from the early days of Music Hall and he played several tunes in a Latin Rhythm. One of these is by Dan Pawson's Artesian Hall Stompers, called Take Her To Jamaica. See:-
Yet another by the same band is Amor. See:- 

Another source of Latin Rhythm is heard in some New Orleans Parade Bands. This example is of The Treme Brass Band at the Red Beans and Rice Parade – 2013 playing Big Chief. See:-

March Time (2/4) – commonly called “two beat”. Again a very general term but below are some examples:-

One of these is a very well-known performance of a pseudo March. It can be heard in the Glen Miller version of Saint Louis Blues. See:- 

In New Orleans there are still “Parade Bands” that play very authentic New Orleans March Styles. An early example of this is the recording of Eureka Brass Band - Lady Be Good. See:- 

As these bands were more often followed by a “second line” (dancers), the March Style had to be played with a grand amount of “swing”.

Introductions and Endings

Introductions

From the earliest Rags originally composed for Piano. See The Entertainer (Piano Ragtime, Joplin):

and The Ragtime Dance - (Scott Joplin, 1906):

......to a modern film score with both tunes. The Entertainer/Rag Time Dance:-

Most early composers incorporated a “Scored Introduction” into their composition. It has been suggested that the reason for the “Introduction” was for the dancers to appreciate being given an idea of what the tune was called, its style (e.g. “One Step”, “Two Step”, “Waltz” or even “Latin”) and its tempo, before deciding to take part in the dance. This followed the arrangements of earlier formal dance types (e.g. barcarolle, mazurka and polonaise).

From the early days of classic jazz bands (e.g. Joe “King” Oliver, Jelly Roll Morton, Louis Armstrong, etc.) the bands would play the “scored” arrangement, or play the last 4 or 8 Bars of the Chorus instead.

See the Bunk Johnson version of I Wish I Could Shimmy Like My Sister Kate:
or the Graham Bell Version – same tune with verse:-
or by Wild Bill Davidson – with verse, using a very common (some say “corny”) ending:-
See My Chords:-
Endings

These tend to follow a similar framework to the “Introductions”, with a repeat of the last 8, 4 or even 2 Bars of the Chorus. There are, however some notable exceptions:-

For instance an example from Jimmy Yancey, playing Yancey Stomp, where the ending bars are in a different key:-

Bouncing Around by A.J. Piron:-

My chords with New Orleans Hot Shots arrangement:-
or by Piron again New Orleans Wiggle:-

As A.J. Piron and Peter Bocage composed both of these tunes, the sheet music would have had not only the Ending but also the Introduction as recorded.

Also see Sister Kate by Wild Bill Davidson – above.

For standard 32 Bar tunes with no arranged ending, the lead (normally the Horn) will signal to the rest of the Band when he/she would like the tune to end and will wind up with a well-established phrase, usually copied from a well-known instrumentalist in a previous time.

There are numerous examples, of which I relate only a few:-

You Tell Me Your Dream by the Mardi Gras Jazz Band :-

Any Time by Kid Thomas:-

Percy Humphrey's Crescent City Joy Makers - Over In The Gloryland:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QV8F2JpThYY 

Louis Armstrong & His Hot Five - Knee Drops 1928:-

Dinah - Muggsy Spanier and his Ragtime Band:-

See My Chords:-
Poor Butterfly - Bunk Johnson & Don Ewell:-

Ken Colyer: Postman´s Lament:-

Wynton Marsalis plays Buddy Bolden Blues:-

Tempo Change

The effect of Tempo Change can be a bit disconcerting for those who wish to dance to a tune being played by a jazz band (or for that matter any dance band ) as the dancers have to be prepared for it.

Two examples:- Bix Beiderbecke - Since My Best Girl Turned Me Down:
and
Dinah - Muggsy Spanier and his Ragtime Band:-

Again the reader might know of many other recordings which have this feature.

Please note the chords included are from my own personal collection (still building from existing 800+ tunes). Any enquires for availability can be made through this Blog.

I have chosen all the “Devices” which are of the most interest to me as a piano player. I have not included references to “Key Changes” as this might be covered at a later date and it tends to be more complicated, but if the reader has any additional ideas that he/she would like to be added, please let me know.
                Chris Reilley. (February, 2015)

4 April 2013

Post 35: SETTING THE TEMPO


Listening to bands in pubs and clubs, and watching videos of performances on YouTube, I have noticed that so many bands have difficulty with setting and keeping to a suitable tempo.

The worst problem (very common) is that bands start an up-tempo tune quickly and then, as the performance develops, gradually slow down. The result is that the music begins to drag and sound weary. I think the reason for this may partly be that so many musicians are growing old and have lost the vigour they once had. But I wish they would be aware of this and take more care.

The reverse sometimes happens: a tune speeds up as it is played. This can put one or two of the players into difficulties.

However, speeding up is by no means as bad as slowing down and can even be deliberate and exciting, especially if building to a special 'out' chorus. The Ken Colyer Band used to be noted for this and they themselves described it as 'controlled acceleration'.

With slower tunes, such as many ballads, there is less of a problem, though I sometimes find bands take a tune too slowly and it begins to drag.

When there is a singer, it is important that the tempo should be one the singer is comfortable with, so it helps to ask the singer to give an indication of the tempo desired or even to count the song in.

As in so many aspects of traditional jazz performance, that great young band Tuba Skinny are setting an example to us all. Notice how much trouble they take to get the tempo right. This is often done with much foot-tapping before the tune begins, while they (especially Shaye the cornet player) test the tune inside their heads just before starting; and they always keep the tempo under control throughout the performance, with rigid discipline from the rhythm section.

This aspect of their playing rewards study.  For a typical example (and a good tune - Deep Henderson),
CLICK ON HERE.

=====================