Welcome, Visitor Number

Translate

13 August 2015

Post 247: GUEST WRITER CHRIS REILLEY ON SETTING THE KEY, THE TEMPO, AND THE VOLUME

Pianist Chris Reilley has submitted articles for use in this Blog before - most recently on the subject of Boogie-Woogie.

Chris has now emailed the article below to me. I hope you will find it of interest.

-----------------------------------------------------

Part two of the various Devices: Breaks, Stops, Riffs, Rhythms and More article which I submitted in February this year, I would like to cover three other aspects which could be considered whilst playing Traditional Jazz namely Key choice and changes Tempo and Volume.

Choosing the Key and Key Changes

Recently I was enthralled by a recording made by the Shotgun Jazz band called “You Always Hurt The One You Love” with the vocal being taken by Marla Dixon (trumpet and leader). In this recording the ensemble is played to begin with and just before the band goes into the Vocal they change key – normally this would be to suit the singer's choice of key for singing. However the band revert back to the original key for the following ensemble and then lo-and-behold Marla sings again in the ensemble key.

For me this is the first time that I have heard any vocalist attempt to do this, as usually the reason for the change of key is because the melody line is outside the vocalist's range.


More often than not a proposed change from the original composed key (say from one of the sharp keys) is to make the tune easier to play for Bb Instruments. For example Concert G Major (1#), D Major (2#'s), A Major (3#'s) etc. would normally be transposed to the nearest (or easiest) flattened keys:- Concert F major (1b) or Ab Major (4b's), C Major (natural) or Eb Major (3b's), Bb Major (2b's) or Ab Major (4b's). Note these are all shown in Concert Keys whereas the Bb Instruments reading their parts would refer the key of Bb major to their key as C Major.
(Note I found this so confusing when I started to learn to play both Clarinet and Trombone that I thereafter memorised the note names on my instrument as the Concert key names.)

All of these choices have to be moderated by the musical range of both the instrument and musician. Some tunes require a very large range with some instruments naturally limited to something like one and a half octaves (not counting the musician's limitations) and in some cases the top end of the available notes might be slightly out of tune (this is especially a problem with Keyed Instruments where the musician has to “bend” the note to keep in tune).

There is no doubt that being able to play in numerous keys is very desirable but it is far easier playing those tunes that are more natural to the instrument and it makes improvising (a salient part of playing Jazz) far easier as well.
Unfortunately the obvious choice for many Jazz Bands is to play a lot of tunes in the easiest keys of concert Bb, Eb and F Major. Whilst this might be the easiest of choices it tends to make for a “Repetitive” range of sound and for those who want to “stand out from the crowd” it might be wise to include tunes in other more uncommon keys.

The use of a change of key whilst playing a chorus (or the main theme) can add interest to the tune for the listener. One example of this can be heard when some Bands play a tune like Tiger Rag where the last chorus is played say a whole tone up from the previous chorus. Eg. the penultimate chorus is in Ab and the last chorus is in Bb. There are numerous examples of this which can be accessed on YouTube.

Another way for Bands to stretch their ability is to play tunes that include several parts, such as those that have a verse (usually in a different key from the chorus), or the more complicated Rags, Stomps or Marches. Not only do these change key from part to part, but the original arrangement (if followed) has other features including “Breaks”, “Riffs”, “Stops” Tempo Change, Latin Rhythms, Minor Strains, etc.

A good guide is to listen to recordings of the Masters playing the tunes you enjoy, but take into account that the equipment used in the early days was not as accurate in respect of timing compared with more modern day so that some recordings could be as much as a tone different to the live performance, so for example if a recording appears to be in D Major, it was probably recorded in Db, if it appears to be recorded in Db it was probably recorded in C Major and most commonly if it appears to be recorded in B major, it was probably recorded in Bb.
Fortunately we are now blessed with Computer Software that can easily correct this deficiency.
Choosing the Tempo

As this can be a more contentious subject, I would like to re-iterate that these words represent my view only and hopefully others will agree.

The first point I would like to make is that the tempo a tune is played at out reflects how the Band intend it to be heard i.e. “Fast”, “Medium” or “Slow” and all the varieties in between. This is usually decided by the leader of the Band and either counted or “tapped in”. Another criterion I would consider important is that of “Swing”. (One way I have found helpful to listen for the “Swing Element” is to listen to the tune being played - or play it solo yourself - and see if you can feel the rhythm throughout.)
I use an example which I have used before of Wynton Marsalis playing “Buddy Bolden's Blues”:-
It is not necessary to watch the Video because you can feel the “swing” from just the audio.
I think most Dancers would prefer that any tune would be easier to dance to if it “swings” as this is the natural rhythm of the tune. As Jazz was more often a “dance music”, I think we ought to be guided by that.
The most common problem I have come across is that of playing a tune too quickly (racing) or at the other end of the scale, playing it too slowly (dragging). With the faster tunes there are several considerations to be made:-
  1. If there are established complicated many-note solos or ensembles required (for example High Society where the Clarinet plays the famous Alphonse Picou solo) the tempo needs to take this into account.
    As a guide watch the Video on YouTube in which he plays this solo at some extraordinary age of about 90 years. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ftr_knt4D8
  2. If there is a Vocal in the tune, the speed has to take account of the singer being able to sing all the words throughout the song without difficulty. As examples, here are two approaches to two different tunes, each played at different tempos:-
    Two versions of “There'll be Hot Time in the Old Town Tonight:-
    Two versions of “Down in Honky Tonk Town”
    Using the “dancing to” yardstick I cannot see anyone preferring the faster of the two tunes. This is however my own personal opinion.
  1. Some of the slower tunes conversely should not be played so slow that they “drag” and yet nor played too quickly and lose the finesse of the melody.
  2. A very great bone of contention for me is when a Band loses control of a steady tempo of any tune, excitement creeps in and away it goes. I confess to being guilty of this myself, but I have learnt to try and control it and as part of the Rhythm Section it is part of our job to try and steady any “racing” down. It is most helpful for the “front line” if the rhythm is kept steady as they want to be able to play their improvisation neatly around the rhythmic accompaniment.
Choosing the Volume

In days gone by there was no such thing as Amplification or Electronic Instruments on a Concert Stand, Dance Hall, Concert Hall, Marching Band instrumentalists were positioned (in most cases) according to how loud they were. In the Recording Studio a similar approach was taken with the weakest-sounding instruments being closest to the “Recording Horn”. From photographs of Jazz Bands performing on Stage it can be seen that a common line up position was arrived at with the line up usually being (facing the Band: “front line” left – Trombone, Centre – Trumpet/Cornet, Right – Reeds (Clarinet/Alto Sax/Tenor Sax). “back line” left – Drums, to his right (with a four piece back line) String Bass/Brass Bass, next right - Piano next right and sometimes part of the “front line” - Banjo/Guitar. The leader would usually be the Horn Player and he/she would usually call the tune to play and set the Tempo. The overall sound would be adjusted most likely by the Drummer who would bring the volume down for the quietest instruments – Clarinet, Bass, Piano and Banjo solos and/or vocals.
At some point the playing volume might change to allow for the larger auditorium and towards the end of a tune. I suspect much of this detail was sorted out at a practice when all arrangements were thrashed out as well.
Then came along electronic amplification and everybody was “miced up” and thereafter the Band Sound was in the hands of the “mixer boys” or in the more hospitable venues, the band used their own portable gear (sometimes less than great) and had to check the sound mid-session.
In my experience the audience soon let you know if you are playing too loudly.

I hope this information does not discourage anyone who may be reading this and who is interested in starting or joining a Jazz Band. I can assure you that playing jazz with other people in a band can be very enjoyable, particularly when it goes well.


Post 246: WHAT IS GOOD TRADITIONAL JAZZ?



I received this e-mail:

Hi Ivan,

You have strong opinions about what is good traditional jazz and what is bad. I know nothing about music. I can't read music. I never learnt to play an instrument. Can you please explain to me what makes some jazz performances better than others?


Wow! That's a tough question.

So let me say right from the start that appreciating any kind of art is a very personal matter. What pleases me may not please you. And that is just how it should be. So I will answer the question in my own way but shall not be surprised if you hold a completely different opinion.

Knowing about music


First, I don't think it's essential to know a lot about music in order to be stirred by traditional jazz or to feel the excitement that it generates. But it does add a little to the intellectual side of appreciation. For example, if you are listening to a piece made up of several different sections (e.g. Buddy's Habit or Climax Rag), it is satisfying to understand which point in the music the band has reached and to be aware when it modulates into a different key. It also makes it a little more interesting if you know something about the chord progression, no matter what tune the band is playing. In other words, you may appreciate it just a little more if you know about the 'grammar' of the music.

But with or without such knowledge, I think it's possible to distinguish between really well played traditional jazz and the not so good.

Preparing and Rehearsing

I think some bands over-rehearse. Things become too arranged and formalized. Much of the freedom and looseness that are features of the best traditional jazz are lost if the players have to concentrate too hard on their 'part' in the 'arrangement'. There is stiffness in the playing of some bands using this approach, especially if they become over-reliant on printed music on stands in front of them.

At the opposite extreme, it is common enough for good traditional jazz to be played without any rehearsal or preparation. Bring together the right mix of experienced players and a fine concert can occur.

But in general I think the best traditional jazz is produced by bands who rehearse at least occasionally, mainly to discuss their music and clarify their approaches to their repertoire. They should tidy up the trickier moments, ensure they are all using the same tune structure and chord progression and they should agree on any special tune endings. The little bit of extra work put in like that can be appreciated and pays off in a better public performance.

Amplification

In general, I think traditional jazz is likely to sound better if played without amplification. (So much 'music' in the last fifty years has been made hard to bear - for me, anyway - by the use of electronic devices and massive amplification.) It is so pleasant to hear musicians in a room with good acoustics and no amplification. You appreciate the sounds of all the instruments in their natural glory. There is no electrical 'humming' or blurring of tone. Performances in Preservation Hall (or in London's Wigmore Hall) testify to the truth of this.

But I accept that bands - in special circumstances - sometimes need amplification. In these cases, it is best if it can be kept to a minimum, for example one microphone for use by the vocalist.

Melody and Soul

Most tunes in our repertoire have stood the test of a very long time. So a good band performance must respect a good melody. There is soul in these old tunes and a good performance finds and expresses that soul. We should hear the melody clearly - maybe decorated and caressed; but it should always be there at the heart of the music. As the late great Chris Blount (clarinet) once said to me, 'If there's no soul, it's just a load of notes.'

Tempo

A good traditional jazz band sets a tempo which is appropriate to the tune and its chosen interpretation; and keeps to that tempo - other than for special effects. It's bad traditional jazz when a tune drags. (I have noticed this quite a lot in YouTube videos.) It can happen either because the tune is started too slowly or because the band slows down during the performance or because of labouring from the rhythm section - especially the drummer. (I don't know why, but On The Sunny Side of the Street is an example of a tune that is particularly prone to labouring!)

Collective Improvisation

When - in ensemble choruses - one instrument (usually the trumpet) is stating the melody, there should be creative support from the other 'front line' instruments (normally the clarinet and trombone). Teamwork is the key to great traditional jazz. If teamwork is good, the performance is more likely to impress. The support will use syncopation and counterpoint. It will be decorative and yet also - by finding the best phrases and harmonies - will push the tune along. You will feel that all three front-line players are listening and responding to each other's ideas and statements. Among today's top players, Barnabus Jones, Haruka Kickuchi and Charlie Halloran (trombones) and Chloe Feoranzo, James Evans, Jonathan Doyle, Aurora Nealand and Ewan Bleach (reeds) are examples of musicians to study on YouTube if you want to see this done supremely well.

Jazzy Devices

This is really an aspect of improvising. But it is important enough to deserve separate mention. A good performance (certainly an exciting one) usually requires a generous dose of those devices that make jazz - especially traditional jazz - so distinctive. Notes bluesily bent or flattened (in the right places), glissandi, breaks, syncopation, the use of 6ths and 9ths where they take us by surprise - all these elements enrich the performance. Without this 'jazziness' you may be left with some very pretty music for dancing but it will lack the spirit of early New Orleans jazz.

Rhythm Section

First, as my friend Barrie said to me, the expression 'rhythm section' is relatively modern and misleading. The whole band should think of itself as the rhythm section. But these days when leaders refer to their rhythm section, they mean the part of the band likely to consist of two or three or four players selected from percussion, banjo, guitar, piano, bass [string or brass]. In a good performance, these players will, as the saying goes, 'sound like one man'. They too must listen carefully to each other and to the trumpet, clarinet and trombone. In so many of the elderly British bands I have heard, or watched on YouTube, they certainly do not sound like one man: often the drummer is too loud and his rhythmic patterns are disruptive to what his colleagues seem to be trying to achieve. At least for the brighter and quicker tunes, most of the time the rhythm section in unison should play a pulsating but not too loud four-to-the-bar poom-poom-poom-poom (not um-CHUCK-um-CHUCK). This pumps the front line along and sets the audience's feet tapping. A good drummer drives the band without being loud or exhibitionist and a good pianist subjects his skills (in ensembles) to the need for a steady rhythmic and chordal underpinning of the music.

Solo Choruses

In performance, most bands include a sequence of 'solo' choruses (normally 32 bars, or even 64 bars) by several of the players in every tune. Often these solos have nothing much of interest to say (they are what Chris Blount would have called 'just a load of notes'), though, if the band has a very good pianist, they give him a rare opportunity to show what he can do. Often solo-takers try to play something stretching to the full their technical skills - showing how clever they are. I suppose this is fair enough if they are technically brilliant. Festival audiences can be counted on to applaud this sort of thing. But my view is that flashy and often raucous solo choruses are not an essential part of good traditional jazz.


Fortunately, in solo choruses a few players are technically brilliant and highly creative at the same time (James Evans again is a great example).

On the whole, though, I don't enjoy a performance padded out with numerous dull solo choruses in which the players have nothing but a string of clichés to offer. I prefer the more creative, unpredictable kind of playing (as best exemplified in the performances of Tuba Skinny) where one player takes the lead for a short time (perhaps 16 bars) but usually other players provide decorative accompaniment to this kind of 'soloing' (another example of good teamwork). Such playing gives the audiences constant delightful surprises.

Sometimes a rather special chorus contributes to a pleasing performance. For example, a band may try a 'front-line-only' chorus and even better a full-band quiet chorus (just tickling the notes) before turning up the volume for the end of the tune.

Ending the Tune

I like a tune to end well, either crisply or with a neat rehearsed coda. I think messy endings are bad.

Band Demeanour

I like all members of the band to take the music seriously. I do not like it when there is much talk between players during the performance of a tune. (Guffaws at each other's private 'jokes' are even worse.) Discreet hand signals for directing the music should be enough.

Listening Test

I will end by giving this tip to my enquirer - and to anybody else like him. When you next listen to a traditional jazz recording, try focusing your ear on just the bass player. If it's a good band, you will be amazed at the precision and importance of his or her contribution.

Now try focusing on just the clarinet. Listen carefully to the notes he or she is playing. How well and how cleverly do they blend into the overall sound?

Try listening intently to the drummer or indeed any of the instruments and you may be surprised at how much your appreciation of what the individuals do (or fail to do) helps you to sort out performances that are really 'good'.